Jump to section
AI in mental health care brings a dual reality—excitement and skepticism. On one hand, there’s real hope that smarter tools can scale access, reduce provider burden, and connect people to care faster. But there’s also caution because, in a space this personal, the cost of getting it wrong isn’t measured in error rates, but in human impact.
I’ve spent much of my career applying machine learning and AI in various contexts. And one thing I've learned in my career is that conversations with therapists, clients, and clinical teams made it clear that the stakes in mental health are human lives.
You’re not just optimizing for speed or personalization. You’re stepping into the most vulnerable spaces of someone’s life. Mental health care is built on trust, connection, and safety, and AI must purposefully become part of that dynamic.
That’s why I don’t believe AI safety is just a technical challenge. Yes, there are algorithms to fine-tune and guardrails to build. But those are just the mechanics. In this field, safety is emotional. Relational. Deeply human.
And when we treat it like a systems problem instead of a people problem, we risk losing what matters most: the patient-provider relationship at the heart of care.
The question isn’t just: “How do we keep the technology safe?”
It’s also: “How do we protect and grow the human relationship this technology now touches?”
At Spring Health, building trustworthy AI starts with designing for safety, consent, and equity from day one—not layering it on after the fact. Because this isn’t about abstract risk. It’s about real people, in real moments, looking for help, and the tools we build have to meet that with care.
Discover how Spring Health is using AI—safely, ethically, and transparently—to expand access and strengthen the relationships at the heart of mental health care.
What AI safety really means in mental health AI
In most industries, AI safety means technical accuracy, content moderation, and data protection. Those matter here, too.
But in mental health, “safety” is broader and more human. It’s not just about whether a model performs—it’s about whether someone feels respected, protected, and cared for in vulnerable moments.
To ground this work, we think about AI safety across four core pillars.
Clinical integrity
The first question we ask when building is simple: Does this support the patient-provider relationship?
While we draw from evidence-informed care, our AI tools are also designed to support relational work, including space for reflection and human connection.
AI should never override clinical judgment. Features like session summaries are built to reduce administrative burden—not to diagnose or direct care.
That’s why our clinical teams help define each tool’s purpose, boundaries, and safeguards from day one.
Privacy and consent
Privacy is foundational in mental health care. HIPAA, SOC2, GDPR, and HITRUST provide a baseline for protecting and securing individuals’ privacy, but our commitment goes further.
We secure data across every layer: usage, storage, access, and transit. Customers deserve confidence that their information is protected with strict controls and regular audits.
At the product level, we embed transparency and consent. Members and providers always know when AI is in use—and participation is always a choice.
Governance
Trust isn’t earned through terms of service—it’s earned through clarity and accountability.
Our AI governance board members—spanning clinical, legal, engineering, and product—work together to evaluate risk, monitor behavior, and ensure we’re building responsibly.
Model fairness
Fairness is one of the hardest challenges in mental health AI—not because it’s new, but because it’s constantly evolving.
Bias once meant gender or race. Now we know it can show up in how we represent neurodivergent experiences or use language across identities and cultures.
There’s no one-size-fits-all “safe” output. That’s why we invest in systems that monitor and surface patterns to our clinical and technical teams—and why fairness isn’t a one-time fix. It’s a continuous process of learning and improving.
Spring Health’s approach to AI safety in mental healthcare
When it comes to AI in mental healthcare, safety can’t be bolted on. It has to be built in from the first design conversation to the last line of code.
One of the biggest differences in how we work at Spring Health is that we don’t treat safety as a checklist. We treat it as a design principle. That mindset shows up across every part of the development process, from how we scope a product to who’s involved in shaping it.
Because we build and manage our core AI systems in-house, we’re able to embed safety at every layer and adapt quickly as standards evolve—while maintaining strong oversight of any third-party components.
That includes how we:
- Design with consent, transparency, and human oversight at the core
- Test for bias and fairness across diverse populations
- Limit AI’s scope to avoid clinical overreach
- Continuously evaluate and monitor outputs
Even small product choices reflect that mindset. Our session summary tool, for example, routes output to the provider—not the member. That gives providers space to review the content and decide how—or if—it should inform their next session.
These decisions may seem subtle, but this is where safety lives—in the details, the trade-offs, and the culture behind how we build.
Designing mental health AI tools clinicians and members trust
Trust is the foundation of any mental health experience, and that doesn’t change just because AI enters the picture. If anything, it raises the bar.
AI must be designed to function and earn and maintain the trust of providers and members. That means building systems that are transparent, consent-based, and always aligned with the clinical relationship—not competing with it.
One of our core principles is that AI is an enabler of care—not a replacement. Especially in high-acuity contexts, where nuance and connection are essential, no machine can replicate what a trained therapist brings to the room. What AI can do is reduce the administrative weight that pulls clinicians away from their patients.
We see this across several tools:
- Pre-appointment intake: A brief, guided experience that helps members share context ahead of a session—summarized for providers to personalize care from minute one
- In-the-moment chat: A secure, optional space for members to reflect between sessions, with clear paths to human support when needed
- Automated session summaries and takeaways: Designed to reduce note-taking burden while giving members a clear recap—without drifting into diagnosis
These tools exist along a spectrum of engagement. Some members may only use the intake form, while others may opt for deeper support between sessions. The key is that every interaction is opt-in, clearly labeled, and built to preserve—not disrupt—the therapeutic alliance.
The same goes for providers. Some may embrace summaries, while others may prefer full control. We build with that in mind, giving clinicians the agency to practice in a way that aligns with their expertise and patients’ needs.
We’re not here to dictate how people connect—we’re here to support them in whatever way helps them connect best.
The future of AI in mental healthcare: Safe, predictive, and personalized
There’s a lot of noise in the AI space right now: big promises, bold claims, and futuristic visions of care. But in mental health, we don’t have the luxury of hype. We have people who need help now, and a system that often makes it hard to get.
That’s why I see our AI roadmap as a responsibility. We’re building tools to improve access, safety, and connection—without compromising trust.
One of the clearest opportunities is helping people find the right care faster. The traditional pathway—searching directories, vetting therapists, repeating your story—creates friction that pushes people away. Our AI-powered intake and matching experiences are designed to reduce those barriers. We’re not just saving time when we help someone find the right provider and support that relationship with context and clarity. We’re helping people stay in care and get better.
We’re also leaning into precision mental health care, using AI to support more personalized, responsive journeys—whether that means surfacing trends for a provider or offering a member helpful tools between sessions.
Of course, none of this matters if it isn’t safe. That’s why we invest in bias evaluation, model monitoring, transparency standards, and human oversight.
We’re not building in isolation. Clinician and customer feedback is part of the process. For providers, it helps us refine tools that fit real workflows. For organizational leaders—those making benefits decisions across large populations—it’s about turning overwhelming data into clear, actionable insights.
Right now, 64% of leaders say their benefit data isn’t usable. Our AI-powered summaries are changing that, highlighting clinical outcomes, visualizing impact, and helping teams tell a stronger story about mental healthcare ROI.
Responsible AI can deliver:
- More precision and personalization in care.
- More clarity and confidence in decision-making.
- More connection between members, providers, and the people supporting them behind the scenes.
The future of mental health AI isn’t about replacing people. It’s about giving them better tools to be human with one another and clearer signals with which to lead.
Leadership in mental health AI starts with safety and trust
As someone who’s spent years at the intersection of engineering, clinical care, and machine learning, I can tell you that AI in mental health isn’t a solved problem. It demands humility, responsibility, and constant iteration.
But it’s also one of the most meaningful problems we can work on. When we get it right, the impact is real—we reduce friction, strengthen relationships, and help people access care that’s faster, safer, and more aligned with who they are.
At Spring Health, we’ve built AI not just to scale care, but to protect and grow the relationships that power it. That means designing for safety, consent, and equity from the start—not as an afterthought.
To the leaders reading this—whether you’re a benefits consultant, a customer, a provider, or a payer—my message is simple:
Choose AI partners who don’t just use the technology. Choose those who govern it.
Ask the hard questions. Look for nuance. Push for transparency. Because in this space, trust isn’t a buzzword—it’s the product.
We’re not building tools to optimize care. We’re building systems that protect what matters most: human connection.
And that’s where the future of care truly begins.
Explore the five core principles guiding our ethical approach to AI and why they matter for safer, smarter, and more inclusive care.
About the Author
.jpg)
